A common Java anti-pattern is to keep the model as a set of simple Java Beans and put the application logic back into a service layer which operates on the model objects.
Martin fowler again has named this anti-pattern Anemic object model:
The basic symptom of an Anemic Domain Model is that at first blush it looks like the real thing. There are objects, many named after the nouns in the domain space, and these objects are connected with the rich relationships and structure that true domain models have. The catch comes when you look at the behavior, and you realize that there is hardly any behavior on these objects, making them little more than bags of getters and setters. Indeed often these models come with design rules that say that you are not to put any domain logic in the domain objects. Instead there are a set of service objects which capture all the domain logic. These services live on top of the domain model and use the domain model for data. The fundamental horror of this anti-pattern is that it`s so contrary to the basic idea of object?oriented design, which is to combine data and process together. The anemic domain model is really just a procedural style design, exactly the kind of thing that object bigots like me (and Eric) have been fighting since our early days in Smalltalk. What`s worse, many people think that anemic objects are real objects, and thus completely miss the point of what object?oriented design is all about.
If you take a look at Play sample applications, you will often see that classes declare public variables. Now if you’re a Java developer with any experience at all, warning sirens are probably clanging like mad at the sight of a public variable. In Java (as in other object?oriented languages), best practice says to make all fields private and provide accessors and mutators. This is to promote encapsulation, a concept critical to object oriented design.
Java has no truly built-in property definition system. It uses a convention named Java Beans: a property on a Java object is defined by a couple of getXxx/setXxx methods. If the property is read-only there is only a getter.
Yes it works. And because the enhanced class follows the Java Beans convention, when you use your object with a library that expects a JavaBean it will work perfectly!
Most of the time you will need to save the model object data permanently. The most natural way is to save this data into a database.
From your code, you can then obtain a java.sql.Connection from the play.db.DB and use it in the standard way.
You can use Hibernate (through JPA) to persist your Java objects in the Database automatically.
You can then obtain the EntityManager from the play.db.jpa.JPA object:
Play provides a nice support class to help you to deal with JPA. Just extend play.db.jpa.Model.
And then manipulate the Product object using simple methods on the Product instances:
What are the common traps you should avoid to keep the model stateless? Do not store any object on the Java heap for multiple requests
2. Save the data permanently into persistent storage (like a database). For example if you need to create an object with a wizard that spans multiple requests:
3. Save the data temporarily into a transient storage (such as the Cache). For example if you need to create an object with a wizard that spans multiple requests:
The Cache is not a reliable storage but if you put an object in the cache you should be able to retrieve it. Depending on your requirements, the Cache can be a very good choice and a good replacement for the Java Servlet session.
A delightful exhibition which explores play through historical toys, games and stories from the unique collections of the State Library of South Australia.
Discover aspects of play including music, dance and theatre, outdoor activity, militaria toys, childrens clubs, Aboriginal childhood, science fiction, universal toys used across generations and the fleeting found objects of play.
Most pieces are drawn from the Childrens Literature Research Collection, one of the State Librarys premier heritage research collections, in a display of never-before-seen objects and old favourites.
This exhibition is sure to evoke memories and create new ones as you think about what play is and what it means for you and your family.
Have you experienced this funny occurrence where your toddler is concerned? If you happen to leave him in the garden, he might just find rocks, leaves and a few other to play with. Sometimes, he may bring these items into the house. Cleaning up after a play session with these items could be a pain for you. However, this occurrence is something you should prepare for. Allow him to play with these items. After some time, he might just get bored of them and move on to something else.
Stop wondering why toddlers play with small objects You definitely dont want to give up the objects. Organising playgroups once in a while could help him focus on other activities that involve other children. Toddlers playing with small things could prove to be tricky. Keep a close watch to ensure your little one is safe at all times.
It remains to be seen if your toddler is still infatuated with small objects six months down the road.It would be wise for you to stop investing in expensive toys till the phase passes.
Researchers have discovered that New Caledonian crows and kea parrots can learn about the usefulness of objects by playing with them - similar to human baby behaviour.
The study, led by researchers at the Universities of York and St Andrews, demonstrated that two types of bird were able to solve tasks more successfully if they had explored the object involved in the task beforehand.
It has long been thought that playful exploration allows animals to gather information about their physical world, in much the same way that human infants learn about their world through play.
In one of the first direct tests of this hypothesis, scientists studied two bird species, the New Caledonian crow and the kea parrot, to understand how they interact with objects before, during and after a task involving that object.
Dr Katie Slocombe, from the University of York, which occurs without any reinforcement, is thought to be particularly important for animals to be able to use objects as tools in a variety of contexts for creative problem-solving.
This means that the birds did not appear to explicitly seek information about the objects, but rather learned about their properties incidentally through exploring. Animals that play with objects learn how to use them as that play with objects learn how to use them as tools.
We offer play objects
play objects, play, objects,